Bungie has officially settled the Destiny 2 Red War copyright lawsuit with sci-fi author Matthew Martineau, closing a year-long legal battle. This outcome not only ends a contentious dispute but may also shed light on Bungie’s broader strategy of retiring and “vaulting” older Destiny 2 content.
⚖️ The Lawsuit: What Happened
- In October 2024, author Matthew Kelsey Martineau filed a lawsuit against Bungie, claiming that Destiny 2’s Red War campaign and the Red Legion faction borrowed heavily from his 2013–2014 online stories.
- The case expanded over time, with Martineau’s team adding Curse of Osiris and even the Destiny Grimoire Anthology books to the claims, arguing that Bungie had lifted narrative beats and world-building elements.
- Bungie attempted to dismiss the case, but it survived into discovery, pulling in old campaigns, lore, and even community-created YouTube content.
- On November 12, 2025, a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge North confirmed that all claims were resolved amicably. The terms remain confidential—no details on monetary compensation or non-monetary conditions have been disclosed.
📜 Backstory: The Red War Campaign
The Red War was Destiny 2’s launch campaign in 2017, introducing players to the Cabal’s Red Legion under Dominus Ghaul. It was a sweeping narrative arc that set the stage for Destiny 2’s identity. However, in 2020, Bungie made the controversial decision to remove the Red War campaign (alongside other legacy content) when introducing the Destiny Content Vault (DCV).
At the time, Bungie explained the vaulting as a way to manage game size, streamline development, and refresh the player experience. Yet, many fans questioned why such a foundational story was erased rather than preserved.
🔍 Connecting the Dots: Did Legal Pressure Influence Content Vaulting?
While Bungie cited technical and creative reasons for vaulting, the lawsuit raises intriguing possibilities:
- Risk Mitigation: If Bungie was already aware of potential copyright overlap, vaulting the Red War campaign in 2020 could have been a preemptive move to reduce exposure. Removing disputed content from active circulation makes it harder for plaintiffs to argue ongoing infringement.
- Narrative Control: By retiring older campaigns, Bungie gained flexibility to reshape Destiny’s lore without being tied to contested material. This could explain why expansions like Beyond Light shifted focus to new factions and storylines.
- Legal Strategy Alignment: The lawsuit’s expansion into Curse of Osiris and the Grimoire Anthology suggests Bungie may have wanted to limit the visibility of older works that could be scrutinized for similarities. Vaulting content fits neatly into that defensive posture.
🎮 Broader Implications for Destiny 2
- Content Vaulting as Policy: Bungie’s settlement reinforces the idea that vaulting wasn’t just about file size—it may have been a legal safeguard.
- Future Campaigns: With this case closed, Bungie is freer to push Destiny 2’s narrative forward without the shadow of litigation.
- Community Trust: Players often lament the loss of iconic campaigns. Knowing that legal disputes may have influenced those decisions adds a new layer of complexity to Bungie’s choices.
The settlement of the Red War lawsuit marks the end of a significant chapter in Destiny 2’s history. While Bungie has never publicly linked content vaulting to legal concerns, the timing and nature of the claims suggest that protecting the company from copyright risk may have been a hidden motivator. For fans, it reframes the debate: vaulting wasn’t only about technical limitations—it may have been about safeguarding Destiny’s future from legal entanglements.
About The Author
